Yin Yang

An End to Conflict

by Geoff on January 8, 2010

Welcome to the New Year, everyone.

I’ve had the great fortune to work over the past few years with an extraordinarily useful yet simple system called Polarity Management, created by one of the most beautiful souls I know – Barry Johnson. Barry has made his life work dedicated to helping us learn to shift from either/or to both/and thinking through this powerful tool that has us identify where a problem we are stuck with might actually be a polarity to manage, and then gives us a clear process for managing it.

In brief, a polarity is a pair of inter-dependent opposites. Each pole in the polarity is value neutral and persistent over time. Neither side is going a way and both have importance. While the poles are value neutral, there is an upside and a downside to each side. When we get out of balance and emphasize one side too much, for example, we can begin to see it’s downside.

So, what we think of as “problems” so often are simply efforts to go from the downside of one pole to the upside of another. Perhaps, you are on a team that is mired in process and discussion and want to scream, “can’t somebody just make a decision!” What you are experiencing may be the downside of an excessively participative leadership – one side of the participative / directive polarity. Start to move away from this unconsciously and the resistance is fear of the downside of the directive pole – too much autocratic decision-making, not getting your voice heard, etc.

There are many benefits from looking through this lens of polarities. It is simple yet powerful, and in my experience working with it in organizations, catches on very quickly and easily.  It readily reveals the resistance in any situation as wisdom that needs attention. We turn 90 degrees from conflict and start moving together. It’s affirming and inclusive, yet gets the energy flowing. It shifts us to a move balanced, integrative, systemic orientation.

There’s another benefit, however, which often overlooked. Polarities are a developmental lever. As we grow in our complexity of thinking and vision, one of the things that shifts is how we work with polar opposites. The shift from either/or to both/and thinking is one such step, but it goes beyond that. Through our developmental research we know that our relationship polarities change as our consciousness develops and working with polarities is like a workout of your leadership perspective that can expand your thinking and identity. In our leadership development programs, we use polarities as one of a set of tools to powerfully stimulate development of greater leadership agility.

This week, look at some place in your work where you see conflict or problem. After asking yourself what the problem and desired state is, ask two more important questions. Regarding the problem, ask, What do I value, to much of which can lead to this current situation? Regarding the solution, ask, What do I fear, if I do too much of the solution? Finalize, what polarity might be present here? What wisdom do you retain and maximize from the current situation? What needs to be balanced? Going back to the example, rather than “can’t anyone make a decision around here?”, try “how can we balance participation and taking action to move forward?”

{ 0 comments }

Post image for It’s Getting Complex

It’s Getting Complex

by Geoff on December 15, 2009

There’s a lot of talk about complexity these days. The world is becoming more complex and this demands that we become more agile and sophisticated in response to it. Leaders need to learn to embrace and deal with complexity, and so on.

An example of the weaving of complexity theory into management practices is the Cynefin framework for sense making, which offers a way to see the world that accounts for complexity and chaos as a part of our experience.

The problem with just seeing complexity “out there” as an part of the objective world, is that it fails to account for the role of consciousness in creating and responding to complexity. Developmental approaches reveal that as we grow in our capacity to think and see, we perceive greater levels of complexity. It is an outcome of our ability to take a greater number of and greater complexity of perspectives on the world.

So the mapping of the complexity of our world may just be a mapping of the glasses through which we look at the world. Furthermore, as we grow to be able to see greater levels of complexity, there are greater demands on our leadership. Developmental research has shown us that only 15% of managers have consistent access to the cognitive and emotional capacity to operate effectively in complex and chaotic environments, implying that system models like Cynefin must be supplemented with individual and organizational developmental capacity building, in order to effectively address the demands on today’s organizations. (For more on this, click here.)

Take a moment to reflect on complexity in your world. Can you identify your learning edges with respect to complexity and chaos? Do you accurately (or in a way that is useful or good) perceive complexity? Do you take skillful actions in the face of complexity? What emotions and thinking arise in you in the face of a situation where you can’t clearly see cause and effect, but need to find a way to act anyway?

Complexity can be learned, but it requires real growth in our capacity in awareness, intent, thinking, emotional intelligence and action.

{ 0 comments }

Coming down to Earth

December 3, 2009
Thumbnail image for Coming down to Earth

One of the things I love about this work is that it allows me to regularly traverse the pathways between the sublime and the ordinary. For example, I’ve been reading an extraordinary book by Jim Marion, called Putting on the Mind of Christ, which explicates the nature of this spiritual path as a way to [...]

Read the full article →